The strike does not help the
Chilean education. the strike is not an end in itself is a way of pressure, and
in the case of the Chilean student movement has been very effective to
concentrate the attention of the press and the authorities.
the strike has historically been
used by various associations and movements to achieve different objectives.
generally associated labor demands character, but in the current Chilean case
the strike is observed mainly in the establishment of educational character,
both school and university
As noted above, the strike has
proved very effective for citizens to discuss deficiencies in Chilean education
It is important to consider the
strike as a means to achieve a goal. in the case of Chile in 2006 and 2011 it
was very important since strikes that occurred in those years forced the
authorities and citizens to discuss education and propose changes and reforms.
it is important to strike work
has the support of most social actors involved in the conflict, officials,
academics, and students and to the extent possible, in the Chilean case
teachers to help as much as possible in these actions and do not seek to
discredit
when the strike does not work
some groups more radicalized its position occupying university or work
facilities. estaccion is considered still more violent than the strike and
seeks to hasten the processes of response of authorities interpellated
I'm not really sure when you said that the strike is a way of pressure....
ResponderEliminarI believe in the Constitution so I think the strikes can help us but we need to progress and be more creative for attention of people. The most important thing that we can making to people it is encourage to intelligent voting
ResponderEliminar